Are you to blame ?
This morning a stupid question has come to my mind while I am riding to office. I can not find the good answer for this question. Personally, I find it seems too hard tofind the best answer.
Here is the full story:
Suppose you are walking along a street and you see a wise venomous snake. Without hurting this creature, you just keep walking since it does not hurt or aim to hurt you. But just one minute later a child who walks peacefully after you is dead by the attack of the wise snack.
Are you to blame? If you killed that snack the child would not die. As the result, your kind action give a chance to snack to bite the child.
But why should you bother to kill that snack? It does not look harmful to you.
Here is the full story:
Suppose you are walking along a street and you see a wise venomous snake. Without hurting this creature, you just keep walking since it does not hurt or aim to hurt you. But just one minute later a child who walks peacefully after you is dead by the attack of the wise snack.
Are you to blame? If you killed that snack the child would not die. As the result, your kind action give a chance to snack to bite the child.
But why should you bother to kill that snack? It does not look harmful to you.
